Contact Us!


How Good is Too Good?
The Cadillac Service Desk Problem

By KAREN M.SOPKO, Founding Director, Cedar Key Ventures, LLC
May 1, 2005

So there you are, proud as punch of your smart, resourceful, creative service desk team. They can answer any question and solve just about any problem from getting the lights turned on to finding out how to navigate the death benefit system.  They know the company, they know the customers, and they have experience, credibility and people skills.  They also have the same bureaucracy, empire building, fractionalization and promotion seeking tendencies as the rest of the company. So right in the middle of upgrading the tools, reorganizing the group and centralizing the teams, somebody starts looking at their internal support costs and asking questions like:

  1. Couldn’t we use overseas labor;
  2. An outsourcer;
  3. Or a joint venture to cut costs?

That’s when things get ugly, and the consultants get called in and start asking: 

  1. How do you justify the best service that money can buy?  What is exemplary service worth? 
  2. Does it make sense to buy and maintain a Cadillac just to do the run rate stuff?  After all, how can an internal support group add to the bottom line?

To respond to all these you have to understand who is making the decision to outsource and what is driving them to it.  This actually happened to some good friends of mine on the west coast.  Don’t worry! It all turned out OK. They got to keep providing great service, and the company got the lower costs they needed.  Here is how they responded to the questions:

  1. Couldn’t we use overseas labor ?
    Yeah, in some areas, they pay less than 1/10th the US rate. They speak great English, know their stuff and have good people skills.  But, will the company’s customers approve of sending their data overseas?

    Remember CRM?  The service desk needs to know a lot about the caller to help effectively.  If the customer list includes the military or state government, they already may have stipulated that their accounts not be supported by offshore resources.  What about internal company proprietary materials? Does that offshore group have security clearance? Do they support competitors? Can they support the in-house applications? You know - the really old, embedded ones that have little documentation?

  2. Could we use outsourcers?
    Increasingly, customers may specify US labor, which leaves the outsourcers with only two ways to win the business - offer a lower SLA or make it up by winning more profitable outsourcing business with the company. Remember the outsourcers are for the most part publicly traded companies. Increasingly, they have to show a profit on each new piece of business. And, on top of the profit margin, they have huge upfront startup costs as well as healthcare and benefit headaches for any transitioned employees. In this case, the company required that the services be provided from a bespoke center instead of a centralized support facility with many customers. This left the outsourcers with very little profit margin, plus facilities and real estate costs as well as the need to use the same labor pool that the customer already had tapped.

  3. Couldn’t we do a joint venture?
    Turn this support team loose and let them function as an independent business unit with prices in line with the industry average. Well, this is tempting, especially if there is no upward career path from support desk to the rest of the company.  The costs however look much like the outsourcer’s costs, real estate, facilities, labor, infrastructure and benefits.  To be competitive, the joint venture would have to win business from other companies. And who are they best suited to serve? The competition.  This ignores the whole issue of sunken costs and investment in Intellectual Property, which the company has already made and which the joint ventures other customers would capitalize on.  Just ask GM.

  4. What is exemplary service worth?
    The bottom line is no matter how good the service, it cannot cost more than the going market rate plus at most a 5% headache premium, meaning that it would be worth a 5% investment in what the company currently has to avoid the disruption that a change would cause.

  5. How can an internal support group add to the bottom line?
    By being awake and aware. By following up on root cause analysis. By responding to the urgent problems faster by supporting the end customer whenever possible. By identifying positive changes and participating in action committees, change teams and six sigma activities. By making the extra effort to get sales teams up and running in remote locations. And, by being aware of the bottom line. A moving target is much harder for the critics to hit.

In the end, I believe it was the tone of humility in the team’s leadership and response to the threat that smoothed things out.  They knew they had problems, and they did not expect forgiveness for high costs.  They did have a plan for improvement, they did make cuts, they did rethink their hierarchical structure and they did participate in other change activities.

This story is not an anomaly. When I was an outsourcer, I dreaded going up against a mobilized internal support team. They won nine times out of ten.


I recently booked a ticket on Southwest Airlines (Disclosure: I own stock, love the company and fly with them as often as I can). The web interface is great, but it lacks a certain deep understanding of the complexities of traveling with small children. So, I called the help desk to talk to a real person.  This could have gone badly. Very badly! Visions of long waits, wrong answers and bureaucracy scrolled before my eyes.  I like the online systems. I prefer to talk with the reservation computer, but it can’t answer the really weird questions like, “How wide are the seats and will my kid be kicking the guy in front of us all the way to Disney World?” For these and other questions, I needed a real live person to navigate for me, which the nice lady and her supervisor did.

The need for excellent, informed, creative people to answer the phone for customers has not disappeared. It’s just moved to the next level of complexity.

iDealReview is published by Cedar Key Ventures, LLC.  Neither iDealReview nor Cedar Key Ventures, LLC are in the business of offering legal advice.  Readers should always consult with their attorney for contract and other legal issues.  The opinions expressed in iDealReview are provided without any warranty or guarantee of fitness for any purpose.  Readers make use of any information presented on this web site at their own risk.
All content of this web site and linked documents are Copyright © Cedar Key Ventures, LLC 1999-2005 unless otherwise identified.  All rights are reserved worldwide.  Use of this site is subject to terms and conditions that the viewer agrees to by continued viewing.